Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHG vs TIP: how they differ

SCHG and TIP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SCHG returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and iShares TIPS Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and TIP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHGOnly in TIP
NVIDIA Corp 11.02%United States of America 4.10%
Apple Inc 9.84%United States of America 4.04%
Microsoft Corp 7.18%United States of America 3.63%
Amazon.com Inc 5.68%United States of America 3.44%
Alphabet Inc 4.76%United States of America 3.41%
Broadcom Inc 4.55%United States of America 3.39%
Tesla Inc 3.92%United States of America 3.37%
Alphabet Inc 3.78%United States of America 3.36%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHG and TIP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabiShares
What it isU.S. Large-Cap GrowthTIPS Bond
Total return, 1 year+12.7%−1.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.8 pts−18.5 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.18%
Holdings19348

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

TIP in plain words

TIP is a bond fund tracking the TIPS Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or TIP?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +12.7% and TIP returned −1.0%, so SCHG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHG or TIP?
SCHG charges 0.04% a year and TIP charges 0.18%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHG against TIP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHG against TIP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHG-TIP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources