Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SCHG vs TIP: how they differ
SCHG and TIP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SCHG returned more over the year.
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and iShares TIPS Bond ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and TIP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in SCHG | Only in TIP |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 11.02% | United States of America 4.10% |
| Apple Inc 9.84% | United States of America 4.04% |
| Microsoft Corp 7.18% | United States of America 3.63% |
| Amazon.com Inc 5.68% | United States of America 3.44% |
| Alphabet Inc 4.76% | United States of America 3.41% |
| Broadcom Inc 4.55% | United States of America 3.39% |
| Tesla Inc 3.92% | United States of America 3.37% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.78% | United States of America 3.36% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Schwab | iShares |
| What it is | U.S. Large-Cap Growth | TIPS Bond |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.7% | −1.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −4.8 pts | −18.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.18% |
| Holdings | 193 | 48 |
SCHG in plain words
SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.
TIP in plain words
TIP is a bond fund tracking the TIPS Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or TIP?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +12.7% and TIP returned −1.0%, so SCHG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SCHG or TIP?
- SCHG charges 0.04% a year and TIP charges 0.18%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHG against TIP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHG-TIP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources