Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHG vs SPYG: how they differ

SCHG and SPYG hold 67% of their weight in the same names, and SPYG returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and SPYG hold 67% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHG and SPYG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHGSPYG
NVIDIA Corp11.02%13.66%
Microsoft Corp7.18%7.81%
Apple Inc9.84%5.99%
Alphabet Inc4.76%5.91%
Broadcom Inc4.55%5.04%
Alphabet Inc3.78%4.71%
Amazon.com Inc5.68%3.48%
Meta Platforms Inc3.46%3.49%
Eli Lilly & Co3.06%2.67%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc2.94%2.67%
Tesla Inc3.92%2.07%
GE Vernova Inc0.91%0.89%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHGOnly in SPYG
Costco Wholesale Corp 1.48%Micron Technology Inc 3.67%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.20%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.58%
Linde PLC 0.81%JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.68%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 0.65%Applied Materials Inc 1.62%
Walt Disney Co/The 0.63%Lam Research Corp 1.53%
Salesforce Inc 0.62%Caterpillar Inc 1.38%
Blackrock Inc 0.53%Johnson & Johnson 1.02%
Danaher Corp 0.40%Sandisk Corp 0.95%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHG and SPYG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
SPYG
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabState Street
What it isU.S. Large-Cap GrowthSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth
Total return, 1 year+12.7%+17.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.8 pts+0.4 pts
Expense ratio0.04%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50095.4%100.0%
Holdings193147

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

SPYG in plain words

SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or SPYG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +12.7% and SPYG returned +17.9%, so SPYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHG or SPYG?
SCHG charges 0.04% a year and SPYG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHG and SPYG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHG and 100% of SPYG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 67% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHG against SPYG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHG against SPYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHG-SPYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources