Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHF vs VYMI: how they differ

SCHF and VYMI hold 40% of their weight in the same names, and VYMI returned more over the year.

Schwab International Equity ETF and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHF and VYMI hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHF and VYMI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHFVYMI
HSBC Holdings PLC1.09%1.73%
Royal Bank of Canada0.91%1.38%
Shell PLC0.81%1.43%
BHP Group Ltd0.74%1.06%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc0.70%1.08%
Toyota Motor Corp0.68%1.12%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia0.67%1.15%
Toronto-Dominion Bank/The0.65%0.99%
Banco Santander SA0.62%0.98%
Allianz SE0.57%0.95%
TotalEnergies SE0.54%0.93%
Iberdrola SA0.50%0.84%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHFOnly in VYMI
SK hynix Inc 2.83%Novartis AG 1.56%
ASML Holding NV 2.12%Nestle SA 1.44%
Novartis AG 0.98%MediaTek Inc 0.66%
AstraZeneca PLC 0.94%Sanofi SA 0.55%
Nestle SA 0.88%Westpac Banking Corp 0.52%
Siemens AG 0.78%Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd 0.46%
SAP SE 0.63%Tokio Marine Holdings Inc 0.46%
SoftBank Group Corp 0.62%ANZ Group Holdings Ltd 0.45%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHF and VYMI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isInternational EquityInternational High Dividend Yield
Total return, 1 year+25.4%+28.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.0 pts+10.7 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.07%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.1%
Holdings14761582

SCHF in plain words

SCHF is an index equity fund tracking the International Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1476 positions, with the top ten at 14.9%.

VYMI in plain words

VYMI is an index equity fund tracking the International High Dividend Yield. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +28.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1582 positions, with the top ten at 13.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHF or VYMI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHF returned +25.4% and VYMI returned +28.2%, so VYMI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHF or VYMI?
SCHF charges 0.03% a year and VYMI charges 0.07%, so SCHF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHF and VYMI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of SCHF and 0% of VYMI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 40% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHF against VYMI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHF against VYMI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHF-VYMI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources