Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHF vs VGK: how they differ

SCHF and VGK hold 34% of their weight in the same names, and SCHF returned more over the year.

Schwab International Equity ETF and Vanguard European Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHF and VGK hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHF and VGK both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHFVGK
HSBC Holdings PLC1.09%2.05%
AstraZeneca PLC0.94%1.84%
Siemens AG0.78%1.41%
Banco Santander SA0.62%1.16%
Schneider Electric SE0.58%1.12%
Allianz SE0.57%1.13%
TotalEnergies SE0.54%1.09%
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC0.52%0.88%
Iberdrola SA0.50%1.00%
UBS Group AG0.50%0.90%
Novo Nordisk A/S0.49%0.88%
Siemens Energy AG0.48%1.02%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHFOnly in VGK
SK hynix Inc 2.83%ASML Holding NV 3.63%
ASML Holding NV 2.12%Novartis AG 1.84%
Novartis AG 0.98%Nestle SA 1.69%
Royal Bank of Canada 0.91%SAP SE 1.12%
Nestle SA 0.88%ABB Ltd 1.02%
BHP Group Ltd 0.74%LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE 0.88%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 0.70%Airbus SE 0.78%
Toyota Motor Corp 0.68%Sanofi SA 0.65%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHF and VGK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
VGK
Vanguard European Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isInternational EquityEuropean Stock
Total return, 1 year+25.4%+16.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+8.0 pts−1.0 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.06%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings14761228

SCHF in plain words

SCHF is an index equity fund tracking the International Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1476 positions, with the top ten at 14.9%.

VGK in plain words

VGK is an index equity fund tracking the European Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1228 positions, with the top ten at 18.1%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHF or VGK?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHF returned +25.4% and VGK returned +16.5%, so SCHF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHF or VGK?
SCHF charges 0.03% a year and VGK charges 0.06%, so SCHF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHF and VGK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of SCHF and 0% of VGK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 34% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHF against VGK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHF against VGK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHF-VGK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources