Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHD vs VTWO: how they differ

SCHD and VTWO hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and SCHD returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF and Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHD and VTWO hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHD and VTWO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHDVTWO
Moelis & Co0.13%0.15%
Murphy Oil Corp0.12%0.14%
Korn Ferry0.09%0.11%
Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc0.07%0.07%
CVB Financial Corp0.07%0.10%
Marzetti Company/The0.06%0.07%
Banner Corp0.06%0.06%
OFG Bancorp0.05%0.06%
Cohen & Steers Inc0.05%0.06%
National Bank Holdings Corp0.05%0.05%
City Holding Co0.04%0.05%
Interparfums Inc0.04%0.05%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHDOnly in VTWO
QUALCOMM Inc 6.75%Bloom Energy Corp 1.83%
Texas Instruments Inc 5.92%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.12%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 5.10%Sterling Infrastructure Inc 0.76%
Coca-Cola Co/The 3.96%Fabrinet 0.69%
Merck & Co Inc 3.87%Nextpower Inc 0.67%
Chevron Corp 3.84%IonQ Inc 0.63%
Verizon Communications Inc 3.66%Coeur Mining Inc 0.58%
Procter & Gamble Co/The 3.55%TTM Technologies Inc 0.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

SCHD and VTWO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isUS dividendRussell 2000
Total return, 1 year+27.6%+21.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+10.1 pts+3.9 pts
Expense ratio0.06%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50095.1%0.5%
Holdings991951

SCHD in plain words

SCHD is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 43.7%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VTWO in plain words

VTWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1951 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHD or VTWO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHD returned +27.6% and VTWO returned +21.4%, so SCHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHD or VTWO?
SCHD charges 0.06% a year and VTWO charges 0.07%, so SCHD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHD and VTWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHD and 0% of VTWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHD against VTWO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHD against VTWO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHD-VTWO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources