Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHD vs VT: how they differ

SCHD and VT hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and SCHD returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHD and VT hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHD and VT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHDVT
Chevron Corp3.84%0.33%
Procter & Gamble Co/The3.55%0.31%
UnitedHealth Group Inc5.10%0.30%
Home Depot Inc/The3.37%0.29%
Coca-Cola Co/The3.96%0.28%
Merck & Co Inc3.87%0.24%
Texas Instruments Inc5.92%0.23%
PepsiCo Inc3.45%0.20%
Verizon Communications Inc3.66%0.18%
QUALCOMM Inc6.75%0.17%
Amgen Inc3.48%0.17%
Abbott Laboratories2.97%0.14%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHDOnly in VT
Accenture PLC 2.90%NVIDIA Corp 4.22%
Erie Indemnity Co 0.14%Apple Inc 3.53%
Federated Hermes Inc 0.10%Microsoft Corp 2.73%
OFG Bancorp 0.05%Amazon.com Inc 2.29%
National Bank Holdings Corp 0.05%Alphabet Inc 2.04%
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corp 0.04%Broadcom Inc 1.74%
German American Bancorp Inc 0.04%Alphabet Inc 1.61%
Lakeland Financial Corp 0.04%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHD and VT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isUS dividendTotal World Stock
Total return, 1 year+27.6%+18.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+10.1 pts+1.4 pts
Expense ratio0.06%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50095.1%55.2%
Holdings9910042

SCHD in plain words

SCHD is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 43.7%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHD or VT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHD returned +27.6% and VT returned +18.9%, so SCHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHD or VT?
SCHD charges 0.06% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so SCHD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHD and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHD and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHD against VT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHD against VT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHD-VT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources