Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHD vs VOE: how they differ

SCHD and VOE hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and SCHD returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHD and VOE hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHD and VOE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHDVOE
SLB Ltd2.06%1.21%
Target Corp1.45%1.03%
ONEOK Inc1.33%0.95%
Ford Motor Co1.72%0.94%
Fifth Third Bancorp1.13%0.89%
Devon Energy Corp1.29%0.83%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co0.97%0.64%
Kimberly-Clark Corp0.82%0.63%
Cincinnati Financial Corp0.62%0.50%
Hershey Co/The0.72%0.45%
Regions Financial Corp0.61%0.45%
T Rowe Price Group Inc0.58%0.42%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHDOnly in VOE
QUALCOMM Inc 6.75%Cummins Inc 1.71%
Texas Instruments Inc 5.92%Valero Energy Corp 1.34%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 5.10%Marathon Petroleum Corp 1.29%
Coca-Cola Co/The 3.96%CRH PLC 1.24%
Merck & Co Inc 3.87%United Rentals Inc 1.23%
Chevron Corp 3.84%General Motors Co 1.21%
Verizon Communications Inc 3.66%Simon Property Group Inc 1.20%
Procter & Gamble Co/The 3.55%Phillips 66 1.18%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHD and VOE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isUS dividendMid-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+27.6%+20.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+10.1 pts+2.7 pts
Expense ratio0.06%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50095.1%96.6%
Holdings99170

SCHD in plain words

SCHD is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 43.7%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VOE in plain words

VOE is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 12.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHD or VOE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHD returned +27.6% and VOE returned +20.2%, so SCHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHD or VOE?
SCHD charges 0.06% a year and VOE charges 0.05%, so VOE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHD and VOE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHD and 97% of VOE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHD against VOE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHD against VOE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHD-VOE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources