Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHD vs VO: how they differ

SCHD and VO hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and SCHD returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHD and VO hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHD and VO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHDVO
SLB Ltd2.06%0.67%
Target Corp1.45%0.57%
Fastenal Co1.28%0.54%
ONEOK Inc1.33%0.53%
Ford Motor Co1.72%0.53%
Fifth Third Bancorp1.13%0.50%
Devon Energy Corp1.29%0.46%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co0.97%0.36%
Kimberly-Clark Corp0.82%0.35%
Paychex Inc0.79%0.31%
Cincinnati Financial Corp0.62%0.28%
Hershey Co/The0.72%0.25%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHDOnly in VO
QUALCOMM Inc 6.75%Vertiv Holdings Co 1.23%
Texas Instruments Inc 5.92%Western Digital Corp 1.07%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 5.10%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.05%
Coca-Cola Co/The 3.96%Quanta Services Inc 1.05%
Merck & Co Inc 3.87%Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.04%
Chevron Corp 3.84%Cummins Inc 0.95%
Verizon Communications Inc 3.66%Datadog Inc 0.84%
Procter & Gamble Co/The 3.55%Bloom Energy Corp 0.79%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHD and VO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabVanguard
What it isUS dividendMid-Cap
Total return, 1 year+27.6%+12.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+10.1 pts−5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.06%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50095.1%91.4%
Holdings99282

SCHD in plain words

SCHD is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 43.7%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VO in plain words

VO is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHD or VO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHD returned +27.6% and VO returned +12.0%, so SCHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHD or VO?
SCHD charges 0.06% a year and VO charges 0.03%, so VO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHD and VO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHD and 91% of VO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHD against VO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHD against VO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHD-VO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources