Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SCHD vs VBR: how they differ
SCHD and VBR hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and SCHD returned more over the year.
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SCHD and VBR hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SCHD | VBR |
|---|---|---|
| East West Bancorp Inc | 0.42% | 0.38% |
| Best Buy Co Inc | 0.38% | 0.33% |
| Fidelity National Financial Inc | 0.30% | 0.26% |
| APA Corp | 0.33% | 0.25% |
| HF Sinclair Corp | 0.28% | 0.23% |
| Skyworks Solutions Inc | 0.29% | 0.22% |
| American Financial Group Inc/OH | 0.23% | 0.20% |
| Columbia Banking System Inc | 0.22% | 0.20% |
| General Mills Inc | 0.46% | 0.20% |
| Old Republic International Corp | 0.21% | 0.19% |
| Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc | 0.45% | 0.17% |
| Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp | 0.24% | 0.16% |
| Only in SCHD | Only in VBR |
|---|---|
| QUALCOMM Inc 6.75% | Jabil Inc 0.87% |
| Texas Instruments Inc 5.92% | NRG Energy Inc 0.66% |
| UnitedHealth Group Inc 5.10% | Tapestry Inc 0.64% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The 3.96% | Atmos Energy Corp 0.62% |
| Merck & Co Inc 3.87% | Williams-Sonoma Inc 0.59% |
| Chevron Corp 3.84% | Moderna Inc 0.54% |
| Verizon Communications Inc 3.66% | Smurfit Westrock PLC 0.52% |
| Procter & Gamble Co/The 3.55% | F5 Inc 0.50% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Schwab | Vanguard |
| What it is | US dividend | Small-Cap Value |
| Total return, 1 year | +27.6% | +16.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +10.1 pts | −1.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.06% | 0.05% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.1% | 30.5% |
| Holdings | 99 | 840 |
SCHD in plain words
SCHD is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 43.7%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VBR in plain words
VBR is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 840 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHD or VBR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHD returned +27.6% and VBR returned +16.3%, so SCHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, SCHD or VBR?
- SCHD charges 0.06% a year and VBR charges 0.05%, so VBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do SCHD and VBR overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHD and 30% of VBR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHD against VBR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHD-VBR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources