Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHD vs USMV: how they differ

SCHD and USMV hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and SCHD returned more over the year.

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SCHD and USMV hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SCHD and USMV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSCHDUSMV
Verizon Communications Inc3.66%1.49%
Coca-Cola Co/The3.96%1.20%
Merck & Co Inc3.87%1.18%
Procter & Gamble Co/The3.55%1.11%
PepsiCo Inc3.45%1.02%
Lockheed Martin Corp2.71%0.79%
Texas Instruments Inc5.92%0.78%
Abbott Laboratories2.97%0.67%
Chevron Corp3.84%0.41%
UnitedHealth Group Inc5.10%0.39%
Amgen Inc3.48%0.31%
Hershey Co/The0.72%0.23%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SCHDOnly in USMV
ConocoPhillips 3.52%CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.81%
Altria Group Inc 2.94%NVIDIA CORPORATION 1.64%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.94%EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%
Accenture PLC 2.90%MICROSOFT CORPORATION 1.56%
Comcast Corp 2.25%DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 1.55%
Blackstone Inc 2.21%THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 1.53%
SLB Ltd 2.06%AMPHENOL CORPORATION 1.51%
United Parcel Service Inc 1.99%Chubb Limited 1.50%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

SCHD and USMV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabiShares
What it isUS dividendMSCI USA Min Vol Factor
Total return, 1 year+27.6%+6.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+10.1 pts−10.9 pts
Expense ratio0.06%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50095.1%94.8%
Holdings99170

SCHD in plain words

SCHD is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 43.7%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

USMV in plain words

USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHD or USMV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHD returned +27.6% and USMV returned +6.6%, so SCHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SCHD or USMV?
SCHD charges 0.06% a year and USMV charges 0.15%, so SCHD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SCHD and USMV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of SCHD and 95% of USMV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHD against USMV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHD against USMV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHD-USMV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources