Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
SCHB vs VONG: how they differ
SCHB and VONG are both equity index funds, and over the year SCHB returned more, +17.2% against +7.2%.
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.
| SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Schwab | Vanguard |
| What it is | US broad market, book from ITOT | Russell 1000 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +7.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.3 pts | −10.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.07% |
| Holdings | not filed | 387 |
SCHB in plain words
SCHB is an index equity fund tracking the US broad market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.
VONG in plain words
VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHB or VONG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHB returned +17.2% and VONG returned +7.2%, so SCHB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHB against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHB-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources