Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SCHB vs SHV: how they differ

SCHB is an equity index fund and SHV a bond index fund, and over the year SCHB returned more, +17.2% against +3.6%.

Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF.

SCHB and SHV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
SHV
iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSchwabiShares
What it isUS broad market, book from ITOT0-1 Year Treasury Bond
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+3.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts−13.9 pts
Expense rationot published0.15%
Holdingsnot filed13

SCHB in plain words

SCHB is an index equity fund tracking the US broad market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.

SHV in plain words

SHV is a bond fund tracking the 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SCHB or SHV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHB returned +17.2% and SHV returned +3.6%, so SCHB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SCHB against SHV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCHB against SHV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/SCHB-SHV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources