Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

RSP vs VB: how they differ

RSP and VB hold 19% of their weight in the same names.

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RSP and VB hold 19% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions RSP and VB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingRSPVB
Jabil Inc.0.26%0.49%
EMCOR Group, Inc.0.24%0.45%
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.0.23%0.27%
CDW Corp.0.22%0.22%
Invitation Homes Inc.0.22%0.22%
F5, Inc.0.22%0.29%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.0.21%0.36%
Generac Holdings Inc.0.23%0.21%
Qnity Electronics, Inc.0.23%0.21%
Viatris Inc.0.21%0.23%
IDEX Corp.0.22%0.20%
Weyerhaeuser Co.0.20%0.21%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in RSPOnly in VB
Intel Corp. 0.38%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.34%REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 0.33%Astera Labs Inc 0.45%
ON Semiconductor Corp. 0.33%Natera Inc 0.45%
Sandisk Corp. 0.32%Twilio Inc 0.38%
Western Digital Corp. 0.31%MKS Instruments Inc 0.37%
Ciena Corp. 0.30%Flex Ltd 0.36%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 0.29%Carpenter Technology Corp 0.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

RSP and VB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoVanguard
What it isS&P 500 equal weightSmall-Cap
Total return, 1 year+14.8%+15.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.7 pts−2.3 pts
Expense ratio0.20%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50099.1%21.7%
Holdings5031311

RSP in plain words

RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 503 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RSP or VB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RSP returned +14.8% and VB returned +15.2%, so VB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, RSP or VB?
RSP charges 0.20% a year and VB charges 0.03%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RSP and VB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of RSP and 22% of VB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 19% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RSP against VB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RSP against VB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/RSP-VB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources