Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

RSP vs URTH: how they differ

RSP and URTH hold 35% of their weight in the same names, and URTH returned more over the year.

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF and iShares MSCI World ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RSP and URTH hold 35% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions RSP and URTH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingRSPURTH
Intel Corp.0.38%0.57%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.0.33%0.92%
Texas Instruments Inc.0.27%0.30%
QUALCOMM Inc.0.26%0.29%
UnitedHealth Group Inc.0.25%0.38%
GE Vernova Inc.0.25%0.29%
Caterpillar Inc.0.24%0.45%
Amazon.com, Inc.0.24%2.86%
Micron Technology, Inc.0.24%1.20%
Broadcom Inc.0.24%2.21%
Morgan Stanley0.23%0.27%
KLA Corp.0.23%0.28%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in RSPOnly in URTH
Sandisk Corp. 0.32%ASML Holding N.V. 0.69%
Skyworks Solutions, Inc. 0.24%HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.35%
APA Corp. 0.24%ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.32%
Generac Holdings Inc. 0.23%Novartis AG 0.31%
Franklin Resources, Inc. 0.23%ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.29%
Albemarle Corp. 0.23%Nestle S.A. 0.29%
Coterra Energy Inc. 0.22%SHELL PLC 0.26%
BXP, Inc. 0.22%Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 0.26%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

RSP and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoiShares
What it isS&P 500 equal weightMSCI World
Total return, 1 year+14.8%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−2.7 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.20%0.24%
Already in the S&P 50099.1%70.3%
Holdings5031322

RSP in plain words

RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 503 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

URTH in plain words

URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1322 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RSP or URTH?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RSP returned +14.8% and URTH returned +17.4%, so URTH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, RSP or URTH?
RSP charges 0.20% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so RSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RSP and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of RSP and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 35% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RSP against URTH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RSP against URTH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/RSP-URTH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources