Which returned more over the last year, RSP or SCHP?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RSP returned +14.8% and SCHP returned −0.8%, so RSP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, RSP or SCHP?

RSP charges 0.20% a year and SCHP charges 0.03%, so SCHP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

RSP vs SCHP: how they differ

RSP and SCHP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and RSP returned more over the year.

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RSP and SCHP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in RSP	Only in SCHP
Intel Corp. 0.38%	United States Treasury 4.09%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.34%	United States Treasury 4.03%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 0.33%	United States Treasury 4.02%
ON Semiconductor Corp. 0.33%	United States Treasury 3.79%
Sandisk Corp. 0.32%	United States Treasury 3.62%
Western Digital Corp. 0.31%	United States Treasury 3.42%
Ciena Corp. 0.30%	United States Treasury 3.39%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 0.29%	United States Treasury 3.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

RSP and SCHP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Invesco	Schwab
What it is	S&P 500 equal weight	US TIPS
Total return, 1 year	+14.8%	−0.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−2.7 pts	−18.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.20%	0.03%
Holdings	503	48

RSP in plain words

RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 503 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SCHP in plain words

SCHP is a bond fund tracking the US TIPS. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RSP or SCHP?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RSP returned +14.8% and SCHP returned −0.8%, so RSP returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, RSP or SCHP?: RSP charges 0.20% a year and SCHP charges 0.03%, so SCHP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RSP against SCHP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RSP against SCHP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/RSP-SCHP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources