Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

REMX vs VYMI: how they differ

Over the year VYMI returned more, +28.2% against +21.9%, and VYMI charges 0.07% against 0.53%.

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, REMX and VYMI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in REMXOnly in VYMI
Xiamen Tungsten Co Ltd 7.28%HSBC Holdings PLC 1.73%
Albemarle Corp 7.24%Novartis AG 1.56%
China Northern Rare Earth Group High-Tec 7.06%Nestle SA 1.44%
PLS Group Ltd 6.84%Shell PLC 1.43%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd 6.80%Royal Bank of Canada 1.38%
MP Materials Corp 6.20%Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.15%
Jinduicheng Molybdenum Co Ltd 5.94%Toyota Motor Corp 1.12%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA 4.92%Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.08%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

REMX and VYMI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsThematic ETFCore index fund
IssuerVanEckVanguard
What it isMiners and metalsInternational High Dividend Yield
Total return, 1 year+21.9%+28.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.4 pts+10.7 pts
Expense ratio0.53%0.07%
Already in the S&P 5007.2%0.1%
Holdings301582

REMX in plain words

By weight, 7% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 30 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +21.9% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 4.4 pts. It sits 67.6% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.

VYMI in plain words

VYMI is an index equity fund tracking the International High Dividend Yield. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +28.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1582 positions, with the top ten at 13.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, REMX or VYMI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, REMX returned +21.9% and VYMI returned +28.2%, so VYMI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, REMX or VYMI?
REMX charges 0.53% a year and VYMI charges 0.07%, so VYMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do REMX and VYMI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 7% of REMX and 0% of VYMI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are REMX and VYMI the same kind of fund?
No. REMX is a thematic ETF and VYMI is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

REMX against VYMI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, REMX against VYMI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/REMX-VYMI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources