Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

REMX vs VTI: how they differ

Over the year REMX returned more, +21.9% against +17.2%, and VTI charges 0.03% against 0.53%.

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, REMX and VTI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions REMX and VTI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingREMXVTI
Albemarle Corp7.24%0.02%
MP Materials Corp6.20%0.01%
United States Antimony Corp1.52%0.00%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in REMXOnly in VTI
Xiamen Tungsten Co Ltd 7.28%NVIDIA Corp 6.37%
China Northern Rare Earth Group High-Tec 7.06%Apple Inc 5.88%
PLS Group Ltd 6.84%Microsoft Corp 3.84%
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd 6.80%Amazon.com Inc 3.19%
Jinduicheng Molybdenum Co Ltd 5.94%Alphabet Inc 2.90%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA 4.92%Broadcom Inc 2.48%
Almonty Industries Inc 4.80%Alphabet Inc 2.29%
Shenghe Resources Holding Co Ltd 4.32%Micron Technology Inc 1.80%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

REMX and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Where it sitsThematic ETFCore index fund
IssuerVanEckVanguard
What it isMiners and metalsUS total market
Total return, 1 year+21.9%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.4 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.53%0.03%
Already in the S&P 5007.2%88.3%
Holdings303531

REMX in plain words

By weight, 7% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 30 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +21.9% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 4.4 pts. It sits 67.6% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.

VTI in plain words

VTI is an index equity fund tracking the US total market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, REMX or VTI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, REMX returned +21.9% and VTI returned +17.2%, so REMX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, REMX or VTI?
REMX charges 0.53% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do REMX and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 7% of REMX and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are REMX and VTI the same kind of fund?
No. REMX is a thematic ETF and VTI is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

REMX against VTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, REMX against VTI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/REMX-VTI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources