Which returned more over the last year, REMX or TLT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, REMX returned +21.9% and TLT returned −6.4%, so REMX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, REMX or TLT?

REMX charges 0.53% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so TLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are REMX and TLT the same kind of fund?

No. REMX is a thematic ETF and TLT is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

REMX vs TLT: how they differ

Over the year REMX returned more, +21.9% against −6.4%, and TLT charges 0.15% against 0.53%.

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.

REMX and TLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF	TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits	Thematic ETF	Core index fund
Issuer	VanEck	iShares
What it is	Miners and metals	20+ year Treasuries
Total return, 1 year	+21.9%	−6.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+4.4 pts	−23.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.53%	0.15%
Holdings	30	not filed

REMX in plain words

By weight, 7% of REMX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 30 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +21.9% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 4.4 pts. It sits 67.6% below its all-time high of Apr 11, 2011.

TLT in plain words

TLT is a bond fund tracking the 20+ year Treasuries. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. It sat 42.9% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, REMX or TLT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, REMX returned +21.9% and TLT returned −6.4%, so REMX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, REMX or TLT?: REMX charges 0.53% a year and TLT charges 0.15%, so TLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are REMX and TLT the same kind of fund?: No. REMX is a thematic ETF and TLT is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

REMX against TLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, REMX against TLT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/REMX-TLT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources