Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

RDVY vs XLI: how they differ

RDVY and XLI hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and RDVY returned more over the year.

First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF and State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RDVY and XLI hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions RDVY and XLI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingRDVYXLI
GE VERNOVA INC2.80%5.48%
GE AEROSPACE2.13%6.77%
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC1.63%1.55%
PACCAR INC0.97%1.10%
DOVER CORP0.52%0.52%
HOWMET AEROSPACE INC0.51%1.87%
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES COMPANY0.59%0.44%
VERALTO CORP1.65%0.38%
SNAP-ON INC2.00%0.36%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in RDVYOnly in XLI
APPLIED MATERIALS INC 4.69%Caterpillar Inc 8.52%
LAM RESEARCH CORP 4.42%RTX Corp 4.44%
KLA CORP 4.14%Boeing Co/The 2.96%
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP (THE) 2.15%Eaton Corp PLC 2.87%
ALPHABET INC 2.12%Union Pacific Corp 2.81%
WILLIAMS SONOMA INC 2.12%Deere & Co 2.77%
ROSS STORES INC 2.01%Uber Technologies Inc 2.55%
ALLSTATE CORP (THE) 2.01%Vertiv Holdings Co 2.23%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

RDVY and XLI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
XLI
State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFirst TrustState Street
What it isFirst Rising Dividend AchieversIndustrials
Total return, 1 year+22.0%+14.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.5 pts−3.3 pts
Expense ratio0.47%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%100.0%
Holdings7181

RDVY in plain words

RDVY is an index equity fund tracking the First Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 71 positions, with the top ten at 28.6%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLI in plain words

XLI is an index equity fund tracking the Industrials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 81 positions, with the top ten at 41.4%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RDVY or XLI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RDVY returned +22.0% and XLI returned +14.3%, so RDVY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, RDVY or XLI?
RDVY charges 0.47% a year and XLI charges 0.08%, so XLI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RDVY and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of RDVY and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RDVY against XLI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RDVY against XLI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/RDVY-XLI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources