Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

RDVY vs VUG: how they differ

RDVY and VUG hold 20% of their weight in the same names, and RDVY returned more over the year.

First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF and Vanguard Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RDVY and VUG hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions RDVY and VUG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingRDVYVUG
ALPHABET INC2.12%5.76%
NVIDIA CORP1.91%12.63%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC4.69%1.60%
VISA INC1.82%1.54%
LAM RESEARCH CORP4.42%1.51%
META PLATFORMS INC1.50%3.41%
MICROSOFT CORP1.45%7.62%
APPLE INC1.44%11.67%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP1.73%1.16%
MASTERCARD INC1.19%1.13%
KLA CORP4.14%1.10%
GE VERNOVA INC2.80%0.89%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in RDVYOnly in VUG
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP (THE) 2.15%Alphabet Inc 4.54%
WILLIAMS SONOMA INC 2.12%Amazon.com Inc 4.47%
ROSS STORES INC 2.01%Broadcom Inc 4.29%
ALLSTATE CORP (THE) 2.01%Tesla Inc 3.27%
TRAVELERS COMPANIES INC (THE) 2.00%Eli Lilly & Co 2.81%
SNAP-ON INC 2.00%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.62%
CHUBB LTD (SWITZERLAND) 1.97%Sandisk Corp 0.94%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP 1.96%Netflix Inc 0.84%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

RDVY and VUG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
VUG
Vanguard Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFirst TrustVanguard
What it isFirst Rising Dividend AchieversUS growth
Total return, 1 year+22.0%+12.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.5 pts−4.6 pts
Expense ratio0.47%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%97.4%
Holdings71147

RDVY in plain words

RDVY is an index equity fund tracking the First Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 71 positions, with the top ten at 28.6%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VUG in plain words

VUG is an index equity fund tracking the US growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 60.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RDVY or VUG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RDVY returned +22.0% and VUG returned +12.9%, so RDVY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, RDVY or VUG?
RDVY charges 0.47% a year and VUG charges 0.03%, so VUG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RDVY and VUG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of RDVY and 97% of VUG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 20% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RDVY against VUG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RDVY against VUG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/RDVY-VUG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources