Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

RDVY vs VTV: how they differ

RDVY and VTV hold 15% of their weight in the same names, and VTV returned more over the year.

First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF and Vanguard Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RDVY and VTV hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions RDVY and VTV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingRDVYVTV
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY1.91%3.07%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC1.83%4.89%
BANK OF AMERICA CORP1.96%1.37%
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY0.97%0.95%
GE AEROSPACE2.13%0.73%
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY1.82%0.69%
ABBOTT LABORATORIES0.58%0.59%
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP (THE)0.95%0.57%
CITIGROUP INC0.54%0.85%
PROGRESSIVE CORP (THE)0.77%0.48%
SALESFORCE INC1.30%0.46%
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP (THE)2.15%0.37%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in RDVYOnly in VTV
APPLIED MATERIALS INC 4.69%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.96%
LAM RESEARCH CORP 4.42%Johnson & Johnson 2.30%
KLA CORP 4.14%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.13%
GE VERNOVA INC 2.80%Walmart Inc 1.87%
ALPHABET INC 2.12%Caterpillar Inc 1.84%
WILLIAMS SONOMA INC 2.12%AbbVie Inc 1.67%
CHUBB LTD (SWITZERLAND) 1.97%Cisco Systems Inc 1.57%
MUELLER INDUSTRIES INC 1.93%UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.42%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

RDVY and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
VTV
Vanguard Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFirst TrustVanguard
What it isFirst Rising Dividend AchieversUS value
Total return, 1 year+22.0%+22.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.5 pts+5.4 pts
Expense ratio0.47%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%98.6%
Holdings71308

RDVY in plain words

RDVY is an index equity fund tracking the First Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 71 positions, with the top ten at 28.6%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VTV in plain words

VTV is an index equity fund tracking the US value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RDVY or VTV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RDVY returned +22.0% and VTV returned +22.9%, so VTV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, RDVY or VTV?
RDVY charges 0.47% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so VTV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RDVY and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of RDVY and 99% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 15% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RDVY against VTV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RDVY against VTV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/RDVY-VTV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources