Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

RDVY vs VTI: how they differ

RDVY and VTI hold 22% of their weight in the same names, and RDVY returned more over the year.

First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RDVY and VTI hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions RDVY and VTI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingRDVYVTI
ALPHABET INC2.12%2.90%
NVIDIA CORP1.91%6.37%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC1.83%1.80%
META PLATFORMS INC1.50%1.71%
MICROSOFT CORP1.45%3.84%
APPLE INC1.44%5.88%
JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY1.91%1.12%
APPLIED MATERIALS INC4.69%0.80%
VISA INC1.82%0.77%
LAM RESEARCH CORP4.42%0.75%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP1.73%0.57%
MASTERCARD INC1.19%0.56%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in RDVYOnly in VTI
CHUBB LTD (SWITZERLAND) 1.97%Amazon.com Inc 3.19%
ACCENTURE PLC 1.00%Broadcom Inc 2.48%
EVEREST GROUP LTD 0.54%Alphabet Inc 2.29%
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL PLC 0.39%Tesla Inc 1.64%
Eli Lilly & Co 1.41%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.31%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.25%
Johnson & Johnson 0.85%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

RDVY and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFirst TrustVanguard
What it isFirst Rising Dividend AchieversUS total market
Total return, 1 year+22.0%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.5 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.47%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%88.3%
Holdings713531

RDVY in plain words

RDVY is an index equity fund tracking the First Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 71 positions, with the top ten at 28.6%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VTI in plain words

VTI is an index equity fund tracking the US total market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RDVY or VTI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RDVY returned +22.0% and VTI returned +17.2%, so RDVY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, RDVY or VTI?
RDVY charges 0.47% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RDVY and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of RDVY and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 22% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RDVY against VTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RDVY against VTI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/RDVY-VTI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources