Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

RDVY vs VOE: how they differ

RDVY and VOE hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and RDVY returned more over the year.

First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RDVY and VOE hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions RDVY and VOE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingRDVYVOE
ALLSTATE CORP (THE)2.01%1.06%
PACCAR INC0.97%1.10%
BAKER HUGHES COMPANY1.77%0.95%
AFLAC INC0.97%0.93%
EBAY INC1.00%0.86%
STATE STREET CORP1.20%0.77%
AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL INC1.23%0.72%
HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP INC (THE)1.75%0.63%
TRAVELERS COMPANIES INC (THE)2.00%0.61%
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS INC0.85%0.56%
DOVER CORP0.52%0.52%
CINCINNATI FINANCIAL CORP1.55%0.50%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in RDVYOnly in VOE
APPLIED MATERIALS INC 4.69%Cummins Inc 1.71%
LAM RESEARCH CORP 4.42%Valero Energy Corp 1.34%
KLA CORP 4.14%Marathon Petroleum Corp 1.29%
GE VERNOVA INC 2.80%CRH PLC 1.24%
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP (THE) 2.15%United Rentals Inc 1.23%
GE AEROSPACE 2.13%General Motors Co 1.21%
ALPHABET INC 2.12%SLB Ltd 1.21%
WILLIAMS SONOMA INC 2.12%Simon Property Group Inc 1.20%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

RDVY and VOE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFirst TrustVanguard
What it isFirst Rising Dividend AchieversMid-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+22.0%+20.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+4.5 pts+2.7 pts
Expense ratio0.47%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50094.4%96.6%
Holdings71170

RDVY in plain words

RDVY is an index equity fund tracking the First Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 71 positions, with the top ten at 28.6%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VOE in plain words

VOE is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 12.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RDVY or VOE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RDVY returned +22.0% and VOE returned +20.2%, so RDVY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, RDVY or VOE?
RDVY charges 0.47% a year and VOE charges 0.05%, so VOE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RDVY and VOE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of RDVY and 97% of VOE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RDVY against VOE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RDVY against VOE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/RDVY-VOE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources