Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QUAL vs XLRE: how they differ

QUAL and XLRE hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and QUAL returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF and State Street(R) Real Estate Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QUAL and XLRE hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QUAL and XLRE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQUALXLRE
PROLOGIS, INC.0.57%8.72%
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC.0.36%5.01%
PUBLIC STORAGE.0.25%4.51%
CBRE GROUP, INC.0.19%4.11%
VICI PROPERTIES INC.0.14%3.02%
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.0.12%2.73%
EQUITY RESIDENTIAL0.11%2.41%
COSTAR GROUP, INC.0.07%1.20%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QUALOnly in XLRE
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.52%Welltower Inc 11.07%
APPLE INC. 6.28%Equinix Inc 7.10%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.05%American Tower Corp 5.26%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 3.50%Realty Income Corp 4.57%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 3.23%Digital Realty Trust Inc 4.55%
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. 3.19%Ventas Inc 4.50%
VISA INC. 3.09%Iron Mountain Inc 3.91%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 2.92%Crown Castle Inc 3.44%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

QUAL and XLRE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
XLRE
State Street(R) Real Estate Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isMSCI USA Quality FactorReal estate
Total return, 1 year+16.0%+5.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−1.5 pts−11.9 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50098.9%100.0%
Holdings12131

QUAL in plain words

QUAL is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 121 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLRE in plain words

XLRE is an index equity fund tracking the Real estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +5.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 31 positions, with the top ten at 59.4%. It sat 5.6% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QUAL or XLRE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QUAL returned +16.0% and XLRE returned +5.6%, so QUAL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QUAL or XLRE?
QUAL charges 0.15% a year and XLRE charges 0.08%, so XLRE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QUAL and XLRE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of QUAL and 100% of XLRE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QUAL against XLRE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QUAL against XLRE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QUAL-XLRE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources