Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QUAL vs XLC: how they differ

QUAL and XLC hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and QUAL returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QUAL and XLC hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QUAL and XLC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQUALXLC
META PLATFORMS, INC.3.50%19.93%
ALPHABET INC.2.54%13.10%
ALPHABET INC.2.12%10.44%
NETFLIX, INC.2.00%4.84%
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.0.19%4.64%
OMNICOM GROUP INC.0.05%2.51%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QUALOnly in XLC
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.52%Take-Two Interactive Software Inc 5.26%
APPLE INC. 6.28%Comcast Corp 4.71%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.05%Warner Bros Discovery Inc 4.67%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 3.23%Walt Disney Co/The 4.49%
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. 3.19%T-Mobile US Inc 4.16%
VISA INC. 3.09%Verizon Communications Inc 4.15%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 2.92%AT&T Inc 4.10%
KLA CORPORATION 2.79%Live Nation Entertainment Inc 3.50%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

QUAL and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
XLC
State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isMSCI USA Quality FactorCommunication services
Total return, 1 year+16.0%−2.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−1.5 pts−19.5 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50098.9%100.0%
Holdings12123

QUAL in plain words

QUAL is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 121 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLC in plain words

XLC is an index equity fund tracking the Communication services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 76.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QUAL or XLC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QUAL returned +16.0% and XLC returned −2.0%, so QUAL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QUAL or XLC?
QUAL charges 0.15% a year and XLC charges 0.08%, so XLC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QUAL and XLC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of QUAL and 100% of XLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QUAL against XLC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QUAL against XLC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QUAL-XLC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources