Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QUAL vs XLB: how they differ

QUAL and XLB hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and QUAL returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF and State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QUAL and XLB hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QUAL and XLB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQUALXLB
NEWMONT CORPORATION0.42%5.85%
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY0.27%4.95%
BALL CORPORATION0.12%2.23%
PPG INDUSTRIES, INC.0.08%3.62%
PACKAGING CORPORATION OF AMERICA0.07%2.83%
AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION0.04%1.67%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QUALOnly in XLB
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.52%Linde PLC 14.08%
APPLE INC. 6.28%Freeport-McMoRan Inc 5.31%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.05%Corteva Inc 4.97%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 3.50%Ecolab Inc 4.73%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 3.23%Vulcan Materials Co 4.72%
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. 3.19%CRH PLC 4.67%
VISA INC. 3.09%Air Products and Chemicals Inc 4.63%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 2.92%Martin Marietta Materials Inc 4.55%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

QUAL and XLB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
XLB
State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isMSCI USA Quality FactorMaterials
Total return, 1 year+16.0%+12.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−1.5 pts−5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50098.9%100.0%
Holdings12126

QUAL in plain words

QUAL is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 121 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLB in plain words

XLB is an index equity fund tracking the Materials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 26 positions, with the top ten at 58.5%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 26, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QUAL or XLB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QUAL returned +16.0% and XLB returned +12.0%, so QUAL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QUAL or XLB?
QUAL charges 0.15% a year and XLB charges 0.08%, so XLB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QUAL and XLB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of QUAL and 100% of XLB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QUAL against XLB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QUAL against XLB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QUAL-XLB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources