Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QUAL vs XHB: how they differ

QUAL and XHB hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and QUAL returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QUAL and XHB hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QUAL and XHB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQUALXHB
D.R. HORTON, INC.0.76%3.29%
WILLIAMS-SONOMA, INC.0.59%3.34%
PULTEGROUP, INC.0.50%3.44%
NVR, Inc.0.42%3.21%
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC.0.19%3.37%
CARLISLE COMPANIES INCORPORATED0.10%3.28%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QUALOnly in XHB
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.52%Owens Corning 4.10%
APPLE INC. 6.28%Advanced Drainage Systems Inc 3.60%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.05%KB Home 3.56%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 3.50%Builders FirstSource Inc 3.56%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 3.23%Meritage Homes Corp 3.53%
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. 3.19%Toll Brothers Inc 3.52%
VISA INC. 3.09%Installed Building Products Inc 3.49%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 2.92%Masco Corp 3.41%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

QUAL and XHB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
XHB
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Homebuilders ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isMSCI USA Quality FactorSPDR S&P Homebuilders
Total return, 1 year+16.0%−16.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−1.5 pts−34.1 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.35%
Already in the S&P 50098.9%45.7%
Holdings12135

QUAL in plain words

QUAL is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 121 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XHB in plain words

XHB is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Homebuilders. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 46% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 35 positions, with the top ten at 35.6%. It sat 20.6% below its high of Oct 18, 2024 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QUAL or XHB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QUAL returned +16.0% and XHB returned −16.6%, so QUAL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QUAL or XHB?
QUAL charges 0.15% a year and XHB charges 0.35%, so QUAL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QUAL and XHB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of QUAL and 46% of XHB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QUAL against XHB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QUAL against XHB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QUAL-XHB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources