Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QUAL vs VUG: how they differ

QUAL and VUG hold 43% of their weight in the same names, and QUAL returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF and Vanguard Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QUAL and VUG hold 43% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QUAL and VUG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQUALVUG
NVIDIA CORPORATION6.52%12.63%
APPLE INC.6.28%11.67%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION5.05%7.62%
META PLATFORMS, INC.3.50%3.41%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY2.92%2.81%
ALPHABET INC.2.54%5.76%
ALPHABET INC.2.12%4.54%
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.2.45%1.60%
VISA INC.3.09%1.54%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION3.23%1.51%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION1.31%1.16%
MASTERCARD INCORPORATED2.30%1.13%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QUALOnly in VUG
CATERPILLAR INC. 2.52%Amazon.com Inc 4.47%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.12%Broadcom Inc 4.29%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.92%Tesla Inc 3.27%
SLB N.V. 1.56%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.62%
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 1.42%Sandisk Corp 0.94%
WALMART INC. 1.23%GE Vernova Inc 0.89%
ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION 1.21%Intel Corp 0.79%
MERCK & CO., INC. 1.08%Palo Alto Networks Inc 0.78%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

QUAL and VUG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
VUG
Vanguard Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI USA Quality FactorUS growth
Total return, 1 year+16.0%+12.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−1.5 pts−4.6 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50098.9%97.4%
Holdings121147

QUAL in plain words

QUAL is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 121 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VUG in plain words

VUG is an index equity fund tracking the US growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 60.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QUAL or VUG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QUAL returned +16.0% and VUG returned +12.9%, so QUAL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QUAL or VUG?
QUAL charges 0.15% a year and VUG charges 0.03%, so VUG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QUAL and VUG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of QUAL and 97% of VUG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 43% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QUAL against VUG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QUAL against VUG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QUAL-VUG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources