Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QUAL vs VTV: how they differ

QUAL and VTV hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and VTV returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF and Vanguard Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QUAL and VTV hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QUAL and VTV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQUALVTV
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.2.12%2.96%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON1.92%2.30%
CATERPILLAR INC.2.52%1.84%
WALMART INC.1.23%1.87%
MERCK & CO., INC.1.08%1.19%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED1.03%1.42%
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY0.93%1.28%
LINDE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY0.88%0.90%
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY0.75%1.05%
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED1.42%0.73%
ABBOTT LABORATORIES0.55%0.59%
BLACKROCK, INC.0.57%0.51%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QUALOnly in VTV
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.52%Micron Technology Inc 4.89%
APPLE INC. 6.28%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.07%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.05%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.13%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 3.50%AbbVie Inc 1.67%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 3.23%Cisco Systems Inc 1.57%
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. 3.19%Bank of America Corp 1.37%
VISA INC. 3.09%Home Depot Inc/The 1.32%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 2.92%Chevron Corp 1.18%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

QUAL and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
VTV
Vanguard Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI USA Quality FactorUS value
Total return, 1 year+16.0%+22.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−1.5 pts+5.4 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50098.9%98.6%
Holdings121308

QUAL in plain words

QUAL is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 121 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VTV in plain words

VTV is an index equity fund tracking the US value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QUAL or VTV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QUAL returned +16.0% and VTV returned +22.9%, so VTV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QUAL or VTV?
QUAL charges 0.15% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so VTV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QUAL and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of QUAL and 99% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QUAL against VTV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QUAL against VTV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QUAL-VTV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources