Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QUAL vs VDC: how they differ

QUAL and VDC hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and QUAL returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF and Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QUAL and VDC hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QUAL and VDC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQUALVDC
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION1.31%12.04%
WALMART INC.1.23%14.76%
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY0.93%9.27%
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY0.75%8.72%
Pepsico, Inc.0.46%4.30%
MONSTER BEVERAGE CORPORATION0.16%2.24%
THE HERSHEY COMPANY0.06%1.06%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QUALOnly in VDC
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.52%Philip Morris International Inc 4.66%
APPLE INC. 6.28%Altria Group Inc 3.91%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.05%Mondelez International Inc 2.69%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 3.50%Colgate-Palmolive Co 2.37%
LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 3.23%Target Corp 2.03%
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. 3.19%Archer-Daniels-Midland Co 1.41%
VISA INC. 3.09%Keurig Dr Pepper Inc 1.41%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 2.92%Kroger Co/The 1.39%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

QUAL and VDC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI USA Quality FactorConsumer Staples
Total return, 1 year+16.0%+4.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−1.5 pts−12.9 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50098.9%86.6%
Holdings121103

QUAL in plain words

QUAL is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 121 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VDC in plain words

VDC is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer Staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 65.0%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QUAL or VDC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QUAL returned +16.0% and VDC returned +4.6%, so QUAL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QUAL or VDC?
QUAL charges 0.15% a year and VDC charges 0.09%, so VDC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QUAL and VDC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of QUAL and 87% of VDC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QUAL against VDC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QUAL against VDC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QUAL-VDC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources