Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
QUAL vs SPYG: how they differ
QUAL and SPYG hold 44% of their weight in the same names, and SPYG returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QUAL and SPYG hold 44% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | QUAL | SPYG |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORPORATION | 6.52% | 13.66% |
| APPLE INC. | 6.28% | 5.99% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | 5.05% | 7.81% |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. | 3.50% | 3.49% |
| ELI LILLY AND COMPANY | 2.92% | 2.67% |
| ALPHABET INC. | 2.54% | 5.91% |
| ALPHABET INC. | 2.12% | 4.71% |
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. | 2.12% | 2.58% |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. | 2.45% | 1.62% |
| LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION | 3.23% | 1.53% |
| CATERPILLAR INC. | 2.52% | 1.38% |
| KLA CORPORATION | 2.79% | 1.11% |
| Only in QUAL | Only in SPYG |
|---|---|
| SLB N.V. 1.56% | Broadcom Inc 5.04% |
| QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 1.42% | Micron Technology Inc 3.67% |
| COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 1.31% | Amazon.com Inc 3.48% |
| WALMART INC. 1.23% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.67% |
| ATMOS ENERGY CORPORATION 1.21% | Tesla Inc 2.07% |
| ADOBE INC. 1.19% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.68% |
| MERCK & CO., INC. 1.08% | Sandisk Corp 0.95% |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED 1.03% | GE Vernova Inc 0.89% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | SPYG State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | MSCI USA Quality Factor | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.0% | +17.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −1.5 pts | +0.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.9% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 121 | 147 |
QUAL in plain words
QUAL is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 121 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SPYG in plain words
SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, QUAL or SPYG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QUAL returned +16.0% and SPYG returned +17.9%, so SPYG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, QUAL or SPYG?
- QUAL charges 0.15% a year and SPYG charges 0.04%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do QUAL and SPYG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of QUAL and 100% of SPYG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 44% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QUAL against SPYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QUAL-SPYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources