Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QUAL vs SCHX: how they differ

QUAL and SCHX hold 42% of their weight in the same names, and SCHX returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QUAL and SCHX hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QUAL and SCHX both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQUALSCHX
NVIDIA CORPORATION6.52%7.51%
APPLE INC.6.28%6.71%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION5.05%4.89%
ALPHABET INC.2.54%3.24%
ALPHABET INC.2.12%2.58%
META PLATFORMS, INC.3.50%2.02%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY2.92%1.28%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.2.12%1.27%
VISA INC.3.09%0.80%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON1.92%0.80%
WALMART INC.1.23%0.74%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION1.31%0.62%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QUALOnly in SCHX
LINDE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.88%Amazon.com Inc 3.87%
Garmin Ltd. 0.88%Broadcom Inc 3.10%
TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLC 0.83%Tesla Inc 1.79%
ACCENTURE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.83%Micron Technology Inc 1.60%
ARCH CAPITAL GROUP LTD. 0.12%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.23%
WILLIS TOWERS WATSON PUBLIC LIMITED COMP 0.09%JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.18%
Exxon Mobil Corp 0.89%
Intel Corp 0.79%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

QUAL and SCHX on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesSchwab
What it isMSCI USA Quality FactorU.S. Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year+16.0%+16.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−1.5 pts−0.7 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50098.9%94.9%
Holdings121748

QUAL in plain words

QUAL is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 121 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SCHX in plain words

SCHX is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 748 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QUAL or SCHX?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QUAL returned +16.0% and SCHX returned +16.8%, so SCHX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QUAL or SCHX?
QUAL charges 0.15% a year and SCHX charges 0.03%, so SCHX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QUAL and SCHX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of QUAL and 95% of SCHX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 42% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QUAL against SCHX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QUAL against SCHX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QUAL-SCHX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources