Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
QUAL vs SCHG: how they differ
QUAL and SCHG hold 43% of their weight in the same names, and QUAL returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QUAL and SCHG hold 43% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | QUAL | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORPORATION | 6.52% | 11.02% |
| APPLE INC. | 6.28% | 9.84% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | 5.05% | 7.18% |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. | 3.50% | 3.46% |
| ELI LILLY AND COMPANY | 2.92% | 3.06% |
| ALPHABET INC. | 2.54% | 4.76% |
| ALPHABET INC. | 2.12% | 3.78% |
| VISA INC. | 3.09% | 1.92% |
| MASTERCARD INCORPORATED | 2.30% | 1.41% |
| COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION | 1.31% | 1.48% |
| NETFLIX, INC. | 2.00% | 1.27% |
| UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED | 1.03% | 1.20% |
| Only in QUAL | Only in SCHG |
|---|---|
| LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 3.23% | Amazon.com Inc 5.68% |
| THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. 3.19% | Broadcom Inc 4.55% |
| CATERPILLAR INC. 2.52% | Tesla Inc 3.92% |
| APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2.45% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.94% |
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.12% | Palantir Technologies Inc 1.25% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.92% | General Electric Co 1.19% |
| SLB N.V. 1.56% | GE Vernova Inc 0.91% |
| QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 1.42% | Linde PLC 0.81% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF | SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Schwab |
| What it is | MSCI USA Quality Factor | U.S. Large-Cap Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.0% | +12.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −1.5 pts | −4.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.9% | 95.4% |
| Holdings | 121 | 193 |
QUAL in plain words
QUAL is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 121 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SCHG in plain words
SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, QUAL or SCHG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QUAL returned +16.0% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so QUAL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, QUAL or SCHG?
- QUAL charges 0.15% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do QUAL and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of QUAL and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 43% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QUAL against SCHG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QUAL-SCHG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources