Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QQQM vs VOX: how they differ

QQQM and VOX hold 13% of their weight in the same names, and QQQM returned more over the year.

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF and Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQM and VOX hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QQQM and VOX both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQQQMVOX
Alphabet Inc.3.52%16.14%
Alphabet Inc.3.26%10.61%
Meta Platforms, Inc.2.97%21.12%
Netflix, Inc.1.59%4.77%
T-Mobile US, Inc.0.91%2.50%
Comcast Corp.0.39%2.36%
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.0.29%2.74%
Electronic Arts Inc.0.22%2.00%
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.0.18%2.09%
Charter Communications, Inc.0.08%0.73%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QQQMOnly in VOX
NVIDIA Corp. 8.16%Verizon Communications Inc 4.17%
Apple Inc. 7.29%Walt Disney Co/The 3.96%
Microsoft Corp. 5.32%AT&T Inc 3.69%
Micron Technology, Inc. 4.80%Live Nation Entertainment Inc 1.65%
Amazon.com, Inc. 4.62%AST SpaceMobile Inc 1.42%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 3.70%Omnicom Group Inc 1.38%
Tesla, Inc. 3.46%ROBLOX Corp 1.37%
Broadcom Inc. 3.37%Liberty Media Corp-Liberty Formula One 1.16%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

QQQM and VOX on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
VOX
Vanguard Communication Services Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoVanguard
What it isNasdaq-100Communication Services
Total return, 1 year+23.0%+2.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.5 pts−14.6 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%84.5%
Holdings101114

QQQM in plain words

QQQM is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VOX in plain words

VOX is an index equity fund tracking the Communication Services. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 114 positions, with the top ten at 72.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Jan 29, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQM or VOX?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQM returned +23.0% and VOX returned +2.9%, so QQQM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QQQM or VOX?
QQQM charges 0.15% a year and VOX charges 0.09%, so VOX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQM and VOX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of QQQM and 84% of VOX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 13% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQM against VOX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQM against VOX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QQQM-VOX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources