Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QQQM vs VONG: how they differ

QQQM and VONG hold 58% of their weight in the same names, and QQQM returned more over the year.

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQM and VONG hold 58% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QQQM and VONG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQQQMVONG
NVIDIA Corp.8.16%13.09%
Apple Inc.7.29%11.97%
Microsoft Corp.5.32%8.98%
Amazon.com, Inc.4.62%5.07%
Alphabet Inc.3.52%3.91%
Tesla, Inc.3.46%3.48%
Broadcom Inc.3.37%5.78%
Alphabet Inc.3.26%3.15%
Meta Platforms, Inc.2.97%3.20%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.3.70%1.47%
Costco Wholesale Corp.1.86%1.28%
Lam Research Corp.1.75%1.21%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QQQMOnly in VONG
Micron Technology, Inc. 4.80%Eli Lilly & Co 2.67%
Intel Corp. 2.52%Visa Inc 1.57%
Cisco Systems, Inc. 2.09%Mastercard Inc 1.20%
Sandisk Corp. 1.10%AbbVie Inc 1.16%
Linde PLC 1.01%Oracle Corp 1.15%
T-Mobile US, Inc. 0.91%General Electric Co 1.02%
Analog Devices, Inc. 0.89%GE Vernova Inc 0.79%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.84%Home Depot Inc/The 0.73%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

QQQM and VONG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoVanguard
What it isNasdaq-100Russell 1000 Growth
Total return, 1 year+23.0%+7.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.5 pts−10.3 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.07%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%95.6%
Holdings101387

QQQM in plain words

QQQM is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VONG in plain words

VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQM or VONG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQM returned +23.0% and VONG returned +7.2%, so QQQM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QQQM or VONG?
QQQM charges 0.15% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQM and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of QQQM and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 58% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQM against VONG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQM against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QQQM-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources