Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QQQM vs SCHG: how they differ

QQQM and SCHG hold 59% of their weight in the same names, and QQQM returned more over the year.

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQM and SCHG hold 59% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QQQM and SCHG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQQQMSCHG
NVIDIA Corp.8.16%11.02%
Apple Inc.7.29%9.84%
Microsoft Corp.5.32%7.18%
Amazon.com, Inc.4.62%5.68%
Alphabet Inc.3.52%4.76%
Tesla, Inc.3.46%3.92%
Broadcom Inc.3.37%4.55%
Alphabet Inc.3.26%3.78%
Meta Platforms, Inc.2.97%3.46%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.3.70%2.94%
Costco Wholesale Corp.1.86%1.48%
Netflix, Inc.1.59%1.27%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QQQMOnly in SCHG
Micron Technology, Inc. 4.80%Eli Lilly & Co 3.06%
Intel Corp. 2.52%Visa Inc 1.92%
Walmart Inc. 2.48%Mastercard Inc 1.41%
Cisco Systems, Inc. 2.09%UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.20%
Lam Research Corp. 1.75%General Electric Co 1.19%
Applied Materials, Inc. 1.57%GE Vernova Inc 0.91%
Texas Instruments Inc. 1.22%Linde PLC 0.81%
QUALCOMM Inc. 1.18%Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 0.65%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

QQQM and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoSchwab
What it isNasdaq-100U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+23.0%+12.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.5 pts−4.8 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%95.4%
Holdings101193

QQQM in plain words

QQQM is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQM or SCHG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQM returned +23.0% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so QQQM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QQQM or SCHG?
QQQM charges 0.15% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQM and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of QQQM and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 59% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQM against SCHG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQM against SCHG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QQQM-SCHG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources