Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
QQQI vs VTI
NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QQQI and VTI hold 48% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | QQQI | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 7.66% | 6.37% |
| Apple Inc | 6.63% | 5.88% |
| Microsoft Corp | 4.38% | 3.84% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 4.05% | 3.19% |
| Alphabet Inc | 3.32% | 2.90% |
| Broadcom Inc | 2.82% | 2.48% |
| Alphabet Inc | 3.07% | 2.29% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 5.61% | 1.80% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 2.65% | 1.71% |
| Tesla Inc | 3.35% | 1.64% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.12% | 1.31% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 2.51% | 0.80% |
| Only in QQQI | Only in VTI |
|---|---|
| Linde PLC 1.05% | Eli Lilly & Co 1.41% |
| Seagate Technology Holdings PL 0.92% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.25% |
| ASML Holding NV 0.76% | JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.12% |
| Shopify Inc 0.61% | Johnson & Johnson 0.85% |
| MercadoLibre Inc 0.37% | Exxon Mobil Corp 0.79% |
| NXP Semiconductors NV 0.32% | Visa Inc 0.77% |
| Nebius Group NV 0.26% | Caterpillar Inc 0.68% |
| PDD Holdings Inc 0.23% | AbbVie Inc 0.62% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026.
| QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF | VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Income desk | Core fund |
| Issuer | NEOS | Vanguard |
| What it is | covered call, vs QQQ | US total market |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.7% | +20.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +25.6% | +20.0% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −6.9 pts | +0.0 pts |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 14.4% | not an income fund |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | n/a | 3531 |
QQQI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 4, 2026, QQQI paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +25.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.9 pts. At its price on Sep 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualises to 14.3%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterisation rather than a measure of erosion).
VTI in plain words
VTI is a index equity fund tracking US total market. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +20.0% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, QQQI or VTI?
- In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQI returned +18.7% and VTI returned +20.0%, so VTI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, QQQI or VTI?
- QQQI charges 0.68% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- Are QQQI and VTI the same kind of fund?
- No. QQQI is an option-income ETF and VTI is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQI against VTI, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QQQI-VTI.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources