Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QQQ vs VOE: how they differ

QQQ and VOE hold 3% of their weight in the same names, and QQQ returned more over the year.

Invesco QQQ Trust and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQ and VOE hold 3% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QQQ and VOE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQQQVOE
American Electric Power Co., Inc.0.30%0.65%
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.0.29%1.10%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.0.28%0.56%
Baker Hughes Co.0.28%0.95%
PACCAR Inc.0.26%1.10%
Diamondback Energy, Inc.0.24%0.60%
Electronic Arts Inc.0.22%0.45%
Strategy Inc.0.22%0.50%
Xcel Energy Inc.0.22%0.87%
Exelon Corp.0.20%0.83%
PayPal Holdings, Inc.0.18%0.39%
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.0.18%0.73%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QQQOnly in VOE
NVIDIA Corp. 8.16%Cummins Inc 1.71%
Apple Inc. 7.29%Valero Energy Corp 1.34%
Microsoft Corp. 5.32%Marathon Petroleum Corp 1.29%
Micron Technology, Inc. 4.80%CRH PLC 1.24%
Amazon.com, Inc. 4.62%United Rentals Inc 1.23%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 3.70%General Motors Co 1.21%
Alphabet Inc. 3.52%SLB Ltd 1.21%
Tesla, Inc. 3.46%Simon Property Group Inc 1.20%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

QQQ and VOE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoVanguard
What it isNasdaq-100, book from QQQMMid-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+23.0%+20.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.5 pts+2.7 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%96.6%
Holdings101170

QQQ in plain words

QQQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VOE in plain words

VOE is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 12.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQ or VOE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQ returned +23.0% and VOE returned +20.2%, so QQQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QQQ or VOE?
QQQ charges 0.18% a year and VOE charges 0.05%, so VOE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQ and VOE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of QQQ and 97% of VOE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 3% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQ against VOE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQ against VOE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QQQ-VOE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources