Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QQQ vs VO: how they differ

QQQ and VO hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and QQQ returned more over the year.

Invesco QQQ Trust and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQ and VO hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QQQ and VO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQQQVO
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC0.84%1.05%
Western Digital Corp.0.79%1.07%
Constellation Energy Corp.0.46%0.78%
Fortinet, Inc.0.45%0.46%
Datadog, Inc.0.36%0.84%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.0.34%0.63%
Ross Stores, Inc.0.33%0.67%
American Electric Power Co., Inc.0.30%0.36%
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.0.29%0.62%
DoorDash, Inc.0.29%0.66%
Cintas Corp.0.30%0.28%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.0.28%0.31%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QQQOnly in VO
NVIDIA Corp. 8.16%Vertiv Holdings Co 1.23%
Apple Inc. 7.29%Quanta Services Inc 1.05%
Microsoft Corp. 5.32%Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.04%
Micron Technology, Inc. 4.80%Cummins Inc 0.95%
Amazon.com, Inc. 4.62%Bloom Energy Corp 0.79%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 3.70%Robinhood Markets Inc 0.77%
Alphabet Inc. 3.52%Cloudflare Inc 0.76%
Tesla, Inc. 3.46%Valero Energy Corp 0.75%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

QQQ and VO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoVanguard
What it isNasdaq-100, book from QQQMMid-Cap
Total return, 1 year+23.0%+12.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.5 pts−5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%91.4%
Holdings101282

QQQ in plain words

QQQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VO in plain words

VO is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQ or VO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQ returned +23.0% and VO returned +12.0%, so QQQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QQQ or VO?
QQQ charges 0.18% a year and VO charges 0.03%, so VO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQ and VO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of QQQ and 91% of VO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQ against VO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQ against VO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QQQ-VO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources