Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

QQQ vs SPYG: how they differ

QQQ and SPYG hold 58% of their weight in the same names, and QQQ returned more over the year.

Invesco QQQ Trust and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QQQ and SPYG hold 58% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions QQQ and SPYG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingQQQSPYG
NVIDIA Corp.8.16%13.66%
Apple Inc.7.29%5.99%
Microsoft Corp.5.32%7.81%
Micron Technology, Inc.4.80%3.67%
Alphabet Inc.3.52%5.91%
Amazon.com, Inc.4.62%3.48%
Broadcom Inc.3.37%5.04%
Alphabet Inc.3.26%4.71%
Meta Platforms, Inc.2.97%3.49%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.3.70%2.67%
Tesla, Inc.3.46%2.07%
Applied Materials, Inc.1.57%1.62%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in QQQOnly in SPYG
Intel Corp. 2.52%Eli Lilly & Co 2.67%
Walmart Inc. 2.48%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.58%
Costco Wholesale Corp. 1.86%JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.68%
Texas Instruments Inc. 1.22%Caterpillar Inc 1.38%
QUALCOMM Inc. 1.18%Johnson & Johnson 1.02%
Linde PLC 1.01%GE Vernova Inc 0.89%
T-Mobile US, Inc. 0.91%Visa Inc 0.88%
Analog Devices, Inc. 0.89%Mastercard Inc 0.78%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

QQQ and SPYG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
SPYG
State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoState Street
What it isNasdaq-100, book from QQQMSPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth
Total return, 1 year+23.0%+17.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.5 pts+0.4 pts
Expense ratio0.18%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50096.7%100.0%
Holdings101147

QQQ in plain words

QQQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SPYG in plain words

SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, QQQ or SPYG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QQQ returned +23.0% and SPYG returned +17.9%, so QQQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SPYG?
QQQ charges 0.18% a year and SPYG charges 0.04%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do QQQ and SPYG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 97% of QQQ and 100% of SPYG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 58% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QQQ against SPYG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QQQ against SPYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/QQQ-SPYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources