Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
PVAL vs SLV: how they differ
PVAL is an equity index fund and SLV a commodity fund, and over the year SLV returned more, +53.8% against +28.4%.
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF and iShares Silver Trust.
| PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF | SLV iShares Silver Trust | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Putnam | iShares |
| What it is | Putnam Focused Large Cap Value | Silver |
| Total return, 1 year | +28.4% | +53.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +10.8 pts | +36.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.50% |
| Holdings | 45 | not filed |
PVAL in plain words
PVAL is an index equity fund tracking the Putnam Focused Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +28.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for May 29, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 45 positions, with the top ten at 35.6%.
SLV in plain words
SLV is a commodity fund tracking the Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +53.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. It sat 45.0% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PVAL or SLV?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PVAL returned +28.4% and SLV returned +53.8%, so SLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, PVAL against SLV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/PVAL-SLV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources