Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

PVAL vs SIVR: how they differ

PVAL is an equity index fund and SIVR a commodity fund, and over the year SIVR returned more, +54.2% against +28.4%.

Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF.

PVAL and SIVR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PVAL
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerPutnamabrdn
What it isPutnam Focused Large Cap ValuePhysical Silver
Total return, 1 year+28.4%+54.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+10.8 pts+36.7 pts
Holdings45not filed

PVAL in plain words

PVAL is an index equity fund tracking the Putnam Focused Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +28.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for May 29, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 45 positions, with the top ten at 35.6%.

SIVR in plain words

SIVR is a commodity fund tracking the Physical Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +54.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 44.9% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PVAL or SIVR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PVAL returned +28.4% and SIVR returned +54.2%, so SIVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

PVAL against SIVR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PVAL against SIVR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/PVAL-SIVR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources