Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
PULS vs VGT: how they differ
PULS and VGT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VGT returned more over the year.
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PULS and VGT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in PULS | Only in VGT |
|---|---|
| PGIM ETF Trust 2.38% | NVIDIA Corp 16.85% |
| GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98% | Apple Inc 14.59% |
| Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87% | Microsoft Corp 9.47% |
| ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75% | Broadcom Inc 4.21% |
| BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68% | Micron Technology Inc 4.21% |
| FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 3.21% |
| BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56% | Intel Corp 2.03% |
| BROADCOM INC 0.56% | Cisco Systems Inc 1.85% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | VGT Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | PGIM | Vanguard |
| What it is | PGIM Ultra Short Bond | Information technology |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.2% | +35.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −13.3 pts | +17.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.09% |
| Holdings | 553 | 317 |
PULS in plain words
PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
VGT in plain words
VGT is an index equity fund tracking the Information technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +35.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 317 positions, with the top ten at 59.5%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PULS or VGT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.2% and VGT returned +35.4%, so VGT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, PULS or VGT?
- PULS charges 0.15% a year and VGT charges 0.09%, so VGT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, PULS against VGT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/PULS-VGT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources