Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
PULS vs USO: how they differ
PULS is a short-term Treasury fund and USO a commodity fund, and over the year USO returned more, +112.2% against +4.2%.
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF and United States Oil Fund, LP.
| PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | USO United States Oil Fund, LP | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | PGIM | United |
| What it is | PGIM Ultra Short Bond | Oil |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.2% | +112.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −13.3 pts | +94.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | not published |
| Holdings | 553 | not filed |
PULS in plain words
PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.
USO in plain words
USO is a commodity fund tracking the Oil. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +112.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. It sat 57.1% below its high of Apr 8, 2011 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, PULS or USO?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.2% and USO returned +112.2%, so USO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, PULS against USO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/PULS-USO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources