Which returned more over the last year, PULS or SLV?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.2% and SLV returned +53.8%, so SLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, PULS or SLV?

PULS charges 0.15% a year and SLV charges 0.50%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

PULS vs SLV: how they differ

PULS is a short-term Treasury fund and SLV a commodity fund, and over the year SLV returned more, +53.8% against +4.2%.

PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF and iShares Silver Trust.

PULS and SLV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	SLV iShares Silver Trust
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	PGIM	iShares
What it is	PGIM Ultra Short Bond	Silver
Total return, 1 year	+4.2%	+53.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−13.3 pts	+36.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.50%
Holdings	553	not filed

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

SLV in plain words

SLV is a commodity fund tracking the Silver. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +53.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. It sat 45.0% below its high of Jan 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PULS or SLV?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.2% and SLV returned +53.8%, so SLV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, PULS or SLV?: PULS charges 0.15% a year and SLV charges 0.50%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PULS against SLV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PULS against SLV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/PULS-SLV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources