Which returned more over the last year, PULS or SCHP?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.2% and SCHP returned −0.8%, so PULS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, PULS or SCHP?

PULS charges 0.15% a year and SCHP charges 0.03%, so SCHP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

PULS vs SCHP: how they differ

PULS and SCHP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PULS returned more over the year.

PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, PULS and SCHP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in PULS	Only in SCHP
PGIM ETF Trust 2.38%	United States Treasury 4.09%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98%	United States Treasury 4.03%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87%	United States Treasury 4.02%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75%	United States Treasury 3.79%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68%	United States Treasury 3.62%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67%	United States Treasury 3.42%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56%	United States Treasury 3.39%
BROADCOM INC 0.56%	United States Treasury 3.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 29, 2026.

PULS and SCHP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	PGIM	Schwab
What it is	PGIM Ultra Short Bond	US TIPS
Total return, 1 year	+4.2%	−0.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−13.3 pts	−18.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.03%
Holdings	553	48

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

SCHP in plain words

SCHP is a bond fund tracking the US TIPS. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PULS or SCHP?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.2% and SCHP returned −0.8%, so PULS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, PULS or SCHP?: PULS charges 0.15% a year and SCHP charges 0.03%, so SCHP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PULS against SCHP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PULS against SCHP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/PULS-SCHP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources