Which returned more over the last year, PULS or SCHG?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.2% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so SCHG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, PULS or SCHG?

PULS charges 0.15% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

PULS vs SCHG: how they differ

PULS and SCHG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SCHG returned more over the year.

PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, PULS and SCHG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in PULS	Only in SCHG
PGIM ETF Trust 2.38%	NVIDIA Corp 11.02%
GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98%	Apple Inc 9.84%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87%	Microsoft Corp 7.18%
ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75%	Amazon.com Inc 5.68%
BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68%	Alphabet Inc 4.76%
FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67%	Broadcom Inc 4.55%
BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56%	Tesla Inc 3.92%
BROADCOM INC 0.56%	Alphabet Inc 3.78%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

PULS and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	PGIM	Schwab
What it is	PGIM Ultra Short Bond	U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year	+4.2%	+12.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−13.3 pts	−4.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.04%
Holdings	553	193

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PULS or SCHG?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PULS returned +4.2% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so SCHG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, PULS or SCHG?: PULS charges 0.15% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PULS against SCHG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PULS against SCHG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/PULS-SCHG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources