Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

NOBL vs VOOG: how they differ

NOBL and VOOG hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and VOOG returned more over the year.

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, NOBL and VOOG hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions NOBL and VOOG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingNOBLVOOG
Caterpillar, Inc.1.61%1.14%
Johnson & Johnson1.47%0.89%
AbbVie, Inc.1.56%0.49%
International Business Machines Corp.1.71%0.40%
Coca-Cola Co. (The)1.55%0.36%
McDonald's Corp.1.36%0.24%
S&P Global, Inc.1.40%0.16%
General Dynamics Corp.1.57%0.13%
Cincinnati Financial Corp.1.39%0.04%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in NOBLOnly in VOOG
Nucor Corp. 1.77%NVIDIA Corp 14.29%
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 1.73%Microsoft Corp 9.31%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. 1.68%Apple Inc 6.38%
Franklin Resources, Inc. 1.67%Alphabet Inc 6.17%
Colgate-Palmolive Co. 1.62%Broadcom Inc 5.90%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. 1.61%Alphabet Inc 4.90%
Hormel Foods Corp. 1.61%Amazon.com Inc 3.90%
JM Smucker Co. (The) 1.58%Meta Platforms Inc 3.85%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

NOBL and VOOG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerProSharesVanguard
What it isS&P 500 Dividend AristocratsS&P 500 Growth
Total return, 1 year+9.4%+17.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−8.1 pts+0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.35%0.05%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%100.0%
Holdings69146

NOBL in plain words

NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VOOG in plain words

VOOG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, NOBL or VOOG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NOBL returned +9.4% and VOOG returned +17.8%, so VOOG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, NOBL or VOOG?
NOBL charges 0.35% a year and VOOG charges 0.05%, so VOOG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do NOBL and VOOG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of NOBL and 100% of VOOG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

NOBL against VOOG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NOBL against VOOG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/NOBL-VOOG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources