Which returned more over the last year, NOBL or VCSH?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NOBL returned +9.4% and VCSH returned +1.6%, so NOBL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, NOBL or VCSH?

NOBL charges 0.35% a year and VCSH charges 0.03%, so VCSH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

NOBL vs VCSH: how they differ

NOBL and VCSH hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and NOBL returned more over the year.

ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, NOBL and VCSH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in NOBL	Only in VCSH
Nucor Corp. 1.77%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.85%
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 1.73%	Bank of America Corp 0.24%
International Business Machines Corp. 1.71%	AbbVie Inc 0.21%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. 1.68%	CVS Health Corp 0.21%
Franklin Resources, Inc. 1.67%	T-Mobile USA Inc 0.20%
Colgate-Palmolive Co. 1.62%	Boeing Co/The 0.20%
Caterpillar, Inc. 1.61%	Wells Fargo & Co 0.18%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. 1.61%	JPMorgan Chase & Co 0.18%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

NOBL and VCSH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	VCSH Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	ProShares	Vanguard
What it is	S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats	Short-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	+9.4%	+1.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−8.1 pts	−15.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.35%	0.03%
Holdings	69	2999

NOBL in plain words

NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VCSH in plain words

VCSH is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, NOBL or VCSH?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NOBL returned +9.4% and VCSH returned +1.6%, so NOBL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, NOBL or VCSH?: NOBL charges 0.35% a year and VCSH charges 0.03%, so VCSH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

NOBL against VCSH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NOBL against VCSH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/NOBL-VCSH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources