Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
NOBL vs SCHG: how they differ
NOBL and SCHG hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and SCHG returned more over the year.
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, NOBL and SCHG hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | NOBL | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| S&P Global, Inc. | 1.40% | 0.45% |
| Sherwin-Williams Co. (The) | 1.33% | 0.24% |
| WW Grainger, Inc. | 1.55% | 0.19% |
| Roper Technologies, Inc. | 1.32% | 0.12% |
| West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. | 1.73% | 0.08% |
| FactSet Research Systems, Inc. | 1.50% | 0.03% |
| Only in NOBL | Only in SCHG |
|---|---|
| Nucor Corp. 1.77% | NVIDIA Corp 11.02% |
| International Business Machines Corp. 1.71% | Apple Inc 9.84% |
| Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. 1.68% | Microsoft Corp 7.18% |
| Franklin Resources, Inc. 1.67% | Amazon.com Inc 5.68% |
| Colgate-Palmolive Co. 1.62% | Alphabet Inc 4.76% |
| Caterpillar, Inc. 1.61% | Broadcom Inc 4.55% |
| Automatic Data Processing, Inc. 1.61% | Tesla Inc 3.92% |
| Hormel Foods Corp. 1.61% | Alphabet Inc 3.78% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
| NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | ProShares | Schwab |
| What it is | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats | U.S. Large-Cap Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.4% | +12.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −8.1 pts | −4.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 100.0% | 95.4% |
| Holdings | 69 | 193 |
NOBL in plain words
NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SCHG in plain words
SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, NOBL or SCHG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NOBL returned +9.4% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so SCHG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, NOBL or SCHG?
- NOBL charges 0.35% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do NOBL and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 100% of NOBL and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, NOBL against SCHG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/NOBL-SCHG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources